The "invisible hand" of the market is a famous analogy much used
by the proponents of economic expansion. It is explained below:
The Invisible Hand
Modern economic theory dates back to 1776 and the publication
of Adam Smith's book The Wealth of Nations. In his brilliant analysis
of the economic interactions between people, classes and nations, Smith
introduced the image of the "invisible hand" - now one of the
most influential metaphors of economic thought. The idea is that when each
individual pursues his or her own advantage, he or she is "led by an
invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention,"
thereby doing more for society than if he or she had deliberately set out
to do so.
In 1776 when Smith's book was first published, there was little people
could do to enrich themselves without providing goods or services of use
to others. It follows that, in the process of enriching themselves, they
improved the opportunities available in society. Times have changed, however.
As advertising techniques evolved, it became questionable whether some
goods and services actually enriched society in return for the wealth gained
by promoters. With sufficient persuasion, people part with their money in
exchange for illusions associated with material objects. Still, illusions
have some value.
Of greater concern are the enormous fortunes being made buying and selling
financial instruments: stocks, bonds, options, different types of money
and the like. This route to personal fortune has even less justification
as service to society.
Originally stock markets provided a source of capital to finance enterprises
which served people. To the extent that this is still the case, they have
their place.
However, financial markets have taken on a life of their own. Huge investments
are made, not to make money by producing goods, but to make money through
speculation alone. This sort of trading has reached a magnitude estimated
to be 50 to 100 times greater than all trade in goods and services.
In currency trading, fortunes are made from tiny fluctuations in value.
Exchange rates are monitored by computers which notify traders of profitable
opportunities. Rather than providing a just return to investors for services
rendered, this process siphons money out of societies. If we were able to
trace the origins of the $600 billion which changes hands daily in financial
trading, we would find money that otherwise would be funding schools, health
care, artistic expression, international development and all manner of other
civilized benefits.
The invisible hand once turned self-interest to the benefit of society.
Today, the same impulse is pressing society and environment toward collapse.
This massive indiscretion discredits the theory. The invisible hand can
no longer excuse greed and inequity.

Questions and comments are welcome.
Contact Information
Return to front page A Question of Direction
Return to One Hand or the Other.
Back to Two Options.
Back to Economic Problem.
Back to Welcome Page
Last Update: March 9, 1999
Filename: http://www.SustainWellBeing.net/invisble.html