This article appeared in The Niagara Falls Review and The Belleville
Intelligencer May 4, 2001.
If you reproduce this please mention the author and the two newspapers.
Your Earth
By Suzanne Elston:
The tragedy of the Quebec Summit was the failure of both sides to understand
that they share a common goal. Essentially the protesters outside the barricades
and the politicians within all want the same thing survival. What separates
them was how they define that survival.
Our political leaders measure survival in economic terms balanced budgets
and gross domestic product or GDP. But GPD is a poor way to measure value
because it adds up everything that we spent money on, both good and bad.
According to Liberal MP Joe Jordan, "When pollution makes people
sick, the cost of their medical care is added to the GDP. When stolen property
is replaced, security equipment purchased and people tried in courts and
put in jail, the GDP goes up. When the insurance industry has to repair
or replace billions of dollars worth of property because of increasingly
violent weather events, the GDP goes up. These things are added into the
GDP where they are mistaken for progress. In each case, the expenses are
incurred because we have failed to prevent problems. These expenses are
a sign of distress, not increased well-being.
While the GDP includes things that don,t necessarily measure our economic
progress, it also excludes externalities. These externalities, or costs
of production that don,t directly impact the selling price, aren,t given
a value. For example, a manufacturing plant that pollutes the air doesn,t
have to factor the cost of cleaning up that air or the cost of treating
people made sick by that air in its bottom line. Exotic species of tropical
wood may not be afforded the protection needed because they have greater
economic value as an expensive coffee table than they do as a living, breathing
stand of trees. It,s a question of assessing something solely on its economic
value and that misses half the point.
Mike Nickerson, coordinator of the 7th Generation Initiative, points
out that one advantage of globalization is that companies can go to countries
that don,t have as strict environmental or social regulations as we do.
Cheaper child labor and lower environmental standards in one country means
that multinational corporations can externalize more of their production
costs. The result is cheaper finished goods for developed countries, and
much needed revenues for developing nations. Since only GDP is the common
denominator, everyone appears to win, until you factor in the overall costs
of production.
What's truly needed is a system that allows us to expand how we evaluate
all those things that we consider important our personal health and the
health of our environment, the strength of our social network and our ability
to provide for future generations. This idea of an expanded evaluation system
is at the heart of The Canada Well-Being Measurement Act, or Bill C-268,
which was drafted by Nickerson and introduced to the House of Commons by
Joe Jordan (Leeds-Grenville) on April 5th, 2000.
"The Canada Well-Being Measurement Act aims to establish a measuring
system that distinguishes activities which benefit people and ecosystems
from activities which result in and from the degradation of our circumstances,
said Jordan. Although the bill died on the table when the federal election
was called last fall, it was recently re-introduced to the House of Commons
on February 14th, 2001 by Quebec Liberal MP Marlene Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce
Lachine).
The idea behind Bill C-268 is elegantly simple. According to Jordan,
What we count and what we measure shows what we value. If passed, Bill C-268
would establish a set of measurements called the GPI, or Genuine Progress
Index, to monitor the social, economic and environmental well-being of the
people, communities and ecosystems in Canada. The GPI measures would be
regularly reported through the Auditor General,s Office.
Unlike the GDP, the GPI would differentiate between positive and negative
expenses. The GPI would also takes into consideration unpaid work, such
as child-rearing, caring for elders and community work.
"We cannot assume that a growing GDP indicates that we are doing
well, said Jordan. "We have to distinguish expenditures that truly
benefit society from those that signal trouble.
In order for C-268 to become a reality, the voters of this country must
ensure that their local MPs support it in the House of Commons.
"There is only one power available to citizens which does not require
great wealth or the use of violence, said Nickerson. " It is the power
of collective persuasion. It works on the subtle levels of thought and conversation
and it works directly through democracy."
Let your voice be heard.
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
Phone, write or visit your local MP and ask him or her to support Bill
C-268. Letters can be sent to House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 (no postage
required). For information about individual constituency offices, phone
1-800-622-6232 (or 1-800-o-Canada)
WEBSITES OF THE WEEK:
For information about the Canada Well-Being Measurement Act go to http://www.SustainWellBeing.net/index3.html,
or e-mail enquires to sustain@web.ca. You can also write Joe Jordan, MP,
House of Commons, Ottawa K1A 0A6 (again, no postage required.)

Questions and comments are welcome.
Return to: Articles
Measuring Well-Being Index
Why We Will Succeed.
Last Update: May 15, 2001
Filename: http://www.SustainWellBeing.net/7GI/S-Elston.shtml