|
The
previous draft of these construction regulations was subjected to
a single day of public consultations on 18 May 2005 (click
here for details on this public consultation). An active advocacy
campaign was launched in the weeks following the adoption in principle
of these regulations on 26 April 2005. A media campaign also took
off, and included an excellent article by journalist Simon Diotte
in the Mon Toit section of the Montreal newspaper, La
Presse on 28 May 2005, as well as a radio documentary by Josée
Guérin aired on the Radio-Canada (CBC) Outaouais show Fréquence
on 15 June 2005 (click
here to listen to it).
On 26 May
2005, Chantal Plamondon and Jay Sinha met Yves Ducharme, Mayor of
Gatineau, and his assistant David Leclerc. The meeting was productive
and Mr. Ducharme explained that our message was clear to them, in
part because of the huge number of e-mails his office received daily
from all over Canada and abroad strongly criticizing the proposed
Regulations of 26 April 2005.
So, our
e-mail campaign yielded fruit...THANK YOU TO ALL WHO ASSISTED BY
SENDING E-MAILS...but the battle is far from won.
False
promises and smoke in the eyes
We have not
forgotten that the City of Gatineau has led us astray in the past.
In November 2004, we found out about the proposed regulations for
the new City of Gatineau and began to mobilize community support
to prevent the banning of straw bale structures in Gatineau. Dozens
of forms indicating disapproval with the ban were sent to the Urban
Planning Department of the City of Gatineau.
On 1 February
2005, four officials from the Urban Planning Department of the City
of Gatineau agreed to meet with us and Archibio (Pascal Morel and
Michel Bergeron) to discuss straw bale construction. We did a comprehensive
presentation that seemed to convince them there was no reason to
ban straw bale construction. We were given the impression that they
would recommend to the consultants hired to consolidate the municipal
regulations that the ban be removed from the construction regulations,
at least for straw bale structures with a wood frame.
From this moment
on, the process was kept secret and we were not allowed to see the
final text of the regulations. We were nonetheless optimistic. This
was an error, as it seems our meeting with the officials was simply
a smokescreen. The final text of the regulations, including the
clause pertaining to straw bale construction, was adopted on 26
April 2005, and made public on 27 April 2005. It was altered but
did not take into account at all our concerns or recommendations.
The ban was maintained.
The
hypocrisy of “partial acceptance”
The City of
Gatineau then claimed it had “partially accepted” the request of
residents who had filled out forms because, despite the clear prohibition
of straw bale construction on Gatineau territory, such buildings
would be allowed if one followed the procedure for a “special construction
project” (projet particulier de construction) in the Act
Respecting Land Use Planning and Development Such projects might
be authorized only after a long and complex procedure after which
the final decision would still be at the complete discretion of
the City. It was inaccurate and highly misleading to claim that
this procedure was a “partially acceptance” because according to
the facts the message was clear: Gatineau did not straw bale constuction;
the Regulations could not have been more clear.
The message
from the City of Gatineau was:
- Innovative
ecological building techniques such as straw bale construction
would not be welcome on Gatineau territory - or officially allowed.
- If one were
to absolutely insist on using such a technique, it might
be allowed, but the City intended to make it as difficult as possible
for one to obtain approval, and there would be no guarantee one
would get approval even if the building would meet or surpasses
municipal, provincial and federal building code requirements.
A backward ban
that goes against the current
In
November 2004, the Government of Quebec announced a significant
inter-departmental initiative in support of sustainable development.
In fact, straw bale homes are one of the best examples of construction
promoting sustainable development:
1) The straw used in the walls would likely otherwise be burned,
thus increasing CO2 emissions.
2) Straw is a renewable material; it is natural and healthy and
does not emit volatile organic compounds. Thus, the interior air
quality of such buildings is exceptionally healthy, especially for
persons who are hyper sensitive to chemical products.
3) Straw has an exceptional insulation factor (minimum R-28, but
generally R-40+, compared to about R-14 for conventional construction),
which makes the building warm in winter and cool in summer, thus
limiting energy costs.
According to Pascal Morel of Archibio, an ecological habitat intervention
group, "straw bale construction is an exemplary approach to
ecological construction, in terms of reducing the impact on resources,
energy consumption, production of waste, other pollution, and improving
human health, all the while providing an optimal quality of life
for the occupants. At the end of its exceptional life cycle, such
a house will leave a minimum of dangerous products in nature."
(P. Morel, "La maison en ballots de paille", La
maison du 21e siècle, vol.
11, no. 4, Autumn 2004, p. 22).
Updated
8 July 2005
|
|