| ||||||||
Election 2006 (and beyond): Digital Copyright Canada
From: Michael Richardson <mcr_-at-_sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
To: oxen_-at-_lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:17:09 -0400
>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com> writes:
>> Copyright is not a static law, and there are considerable pressures on
>> it that seek to change some of these fundamental rights. In the USA
>> the battle is focused on attacks to "Fair Use" (Fair Dealings in
>> Canada) and the whole "First Sale" concept that loaning, reselling,
>> renting is based upon.
Ralph> The gov't isn't stupid enough (at least yet) to retroactively
Ralph> change the law. Sure they can change the rules that apply to
Ralph> copyright material that I purchase in the future, but short of
Ralph> totally revamping contract law they can't change the terms that
Ralph> apply to the collection of material that I and millions of other
Ralph> Canadians have already purchased.
While the government isn't that silly, software houses are.
That's why they don't like to sell you software, merely license it.
Hollywood is no different.
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
| Please read the FLORA.org Terms and Conditions before you submit information to FLORA.org | |
|
(USA) (Canada) |
|