| ||||||||
Election 2006 (and beyond): Digital Copyright Canada
From: rasmus_-at-_php.net (Rasmus Lerdorf)
Date: 20 Aug 2000 17:24:55 -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008201657030.21091-100000@calcutta.flora.ottawa.on.ca>
> > Probably not. Your issue is with the folks at Zend.com not with the PHP > > team. > > The folks at Zend.com wrote the PHP4 license faq? > http://www.php.net/version4/license-FAQ.php Yes they did. > My largest complaint is with the wording in that FAQ (Commercial != > Proprietary), secondly with problems in the PHP4 license ( > <http://www.php.net/license/2_02.txt> such as needing clarification on > clause 5&6) and only lastly with the confusion that seems to exist between > PHP4 and Zend. > > Only the last problem is Zend specific, and it is not critical compared > to the other two problems. Your other issues would be exactly the same for Apache, which I assume you are also using. The wording of the PHP license is identical to the wording of the Apache license. -Rasmus
| Please read the FLORA.org Terms and Conditions before you submit information to FLORA.org | |
|
(USA) (Canada) |
|