| ||||||||
Election 2006 (and beyond): Digital Copyright Canada
From: russell_-at-_flora.ottawa.on.ca (Russell McOrmond)
Date: 20 Jun 2000 08:38:33 -0400
References: <200006200331.XAA10479@onering.urth>
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Krishna E. Bera wrote: > I'd like to interpret this to mean that proprietary information and > technology *is* the threat to national security, but i suspect they > are actually targetting opponents of proprietary information > technology. My guess is that they mean what big-government has always meant: that they will continue to use the power of the state to protect those who have property from those who do not. There isn't likely anything new here, other than perhaps a growing group of citizens who do not see the protection of property as the primary function of government. I don't think they are targeting Free Software people specifically, but people who governments have deemed to be 'information pirates'. Given the changing nature of patents and copyright to further restrict information distribution (*) this group of citizens who will be declared 'pirates' and thus targeted by the state will be growing. (*) There are new types of information being considered for patent including the absurd allowance for patent of indigenous knowledge/bio-piracy. We have longer length and more inclusive interpretations of copyright to allow things previously not allowed for with copyright. We have the erosion of the right to reverse-engineer, the erosion of fair-use principles, and so on. --- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://russell.flora.org/work/> http://www.flora.org/flora.announce/112 Commuter Challenge: We won! http://www.flora.org/flora.comnet-www/1657 I'm Smoke and Microsoft free. http://metallica.flora.org I'm also Metallica free ;-)
| Please read the FLORA.org Terms and Conditions before you submit information to FLORA.org | |
|
(USA) (Canada) |
|