| ||||||||
Election 2006 (and beyond): Digital Copyright Canada
From: Russell McOrmond <russell_-at-_flora.ca>
To: flora-admin-help_-at-_flora.org
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 00:30:18 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > At 1:13pm -0400, 05/16/03, Russell McOrmond <russell@flora.ca> wrote: > > >Curious: Did PEDNET get legal clearence when the old FTP files were moved > >to FLORA.org? Sounds like the PEDNET list admins should be the last > >people to expect there to be restrictive copyright on the list archives > >since the over-claim of rights from some posters had already been violated > > Before my time. What are the reasonable expectations of such an archive? > That it will be available only on its original host isn't one of them. Where does one draw the line from 'original host' and 'original medium'? Is me burning the archives onto CD (which I have already - part of a backup process) considered a violation of copyright in your mind? What if I give such a CD away? What if I charge? What if someone prints some of the articles? Gives them away? Charges for the printing? There is some line that gets drawn. I'm wanting to say that if someone uses the $Free FLORA.org mailing lists that no line gets drawn and no "economic rights" in copyright can be exercised. If someone is posting messages to FLORA.org mailing lists in the expectation that someone else couldn't print and republish that article (for free or otherwise), then I consider that an unreasonable restriction of the usage of FLORA.org, and very different than what I intended. --- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> Governance software that controls ICT, automates government policy, or electronically counts votes, shouldn't be bought any more than politicians should be bought. -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/
| Please read the FLORA.org Terms and Conditions before you submit information to FLORA.org | |
|
(USA) (Canada) |
|