| ||||||||
Election 2006 (and beyond): Digital Copyright Canada
From: Russell McOrmond <russell_-at-_flora.ca>
To: flora-admin-help_-at-_flora.org
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 00:23:36 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > This doesn't concern Chris or me, per se. This would be of concern to a > number of subscribers. We get messages posted to Pednet that range from > chatty to what could be considered a proto message for a scholarly > article. Several of our subscribers have their own Web sites, some of > which are quite elaborate, especially Todd Litman's VTPI site. They > would not agree that posting an article in an email message to Pednet > means that they've given consent to having that article republished in > an unrelated media. This is something to fix up very quickly then. I never intended to offer via FLORA.org the ability of people to post scholarly articles via mailing lists that are believed to have such copyright restrictions on them. Your other issue of someone re-publishing without attribution, or claiming it to be their own, is not affected by the license agreement that I'm discussing. If someone did that then they are in violation of copyright (moral rights) in Canada, and likely in violation under tort law as well (although I'm not as familiar with this area of law). Sounds like either the list should be moved, and/or these people should be told to only post URL's to the list rather than full text. --- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> Governance software that controls ICT, automates government policy, or electronically counts votes, shouldn't be bought any more than politicians should be bought. -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/
| Please read the FLORA.org Terms and Conditions before you submit information to FLORA.org | |
|
(USA) (Canada) |
|