12-Nov-98   Does predatory pricing make Microsoft a predator?
04-Apr-00   Microsoft guilty of violating anti-trust rules
04-Apr-00   EU currently investigating three complaints regarding Microsoft
03-Aug-00   EU investigates discriminatory licencing
10-Oct-00   Analyzing Microsoft's Corel investment
16-Oct-00   Microsoft stake in Corel: An Analysis
21-Nov-00   European Commission to merge Microsoft probes
14-Feb-01   Microsoft: We're cooperating in Corel probe
15-Feb-01   Microsoft's Corel stake dangerous
18-May-01   Slashdot response to an apparent attempt to censor
28-Jun-01   Key dates in the Microsoft trial
28-Jun-01   UNITED STATES V MICROSOFT - Appeals Court Record
29-May-01   MS launches counter PR attack
29-Jun-01   Right vedict, wrong remedy
29-Jun-01   Real MS Verdict: Jackson blew it
29-Jun-01   Bundle of questions remain for XP
03-Jul-01   Microsoft Could Hold Passport to Net
03-Jul-01   EU case against Microsoft separate from that in the U.S
23-Jul-01   The Monopoly has just begun - Fortune
27-Jul-01   Concern expressed about Microsoft's continuing conduct
27-Jul-01   Microsoft files Supreme Court appeal

 Anti-Microsoft Rants, together with information about business practices:

http://freespace.virgin.net/s.hector/antims.html

Thanks to Paul Nielson for a more extensive list of references:

General media coverage at

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44886,00.html
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-201-5629597-0.html
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6403181.html
http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB992552420526642852.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/28/technology/28CND-SOFT.html
http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,27546,00.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/themicrosofttrial/

MS & DOJ reaction at:

http://www.wired.com/news/antitrust/0,1551,44900,00.html
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/086084.htm
http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB993759597870070912.htm
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/036532.htm
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/033666.htm
http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,27576,00.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/29/technology/29REDM.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61280-2001Jun28.html

State A.G., Congressional & President reaction at

http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/167432.html
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/046040.htm
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/167426.html
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/043456.htm
http://www.latimes.com/business/20010629/t000053774.html

Impact on competition, particularly AOL, at

http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/029240.htm
http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB993764571117421072.htm
http://www.latimes.com/business/20010629/t000053731.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61527-2001Jun28.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61529-2001Jun28.html

Criticism of Judge Jackson at:

http://www.wired.com/news/antitrust/0,1551,44902,00.html
http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB993764629554751665.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/29/technology/29JUDG.html
http://www.latimes.com/business/20010629/t000053810.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61535-2001Jun28.html

Additional analysis, including a special edition of my Globe
and Mail cyberlaw column which argues that Microsoft lost on
many key legal issues and that the relevance of the case
remains as fresh today as 1997, at:

http://www.wired.com/news/antitrust/0,1551,44903,00.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/29/technology/29ANAL.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/29/technology/29REME.html
http://www.latimes.com/business/20010629/t000053825.html
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/06/28/microsoft_appeal/index.html

http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/GAMArticleHTMLTemplate?tf=globetechnology/TGAM/EBusinessFullStory.html&cf=globetechnology/tech-config-neutral&slug=RLEGA&date=20010629>

Net Action's Campaign:

http://netaction.org/msoft/